Sometimes the voice says more than the face.

Researchers Had Strangers Read Each Other's Feelings by Sight, by Sound, or Both. Hearing the Voice Alone Did Best.

Five experiments with 1,772 people found that when strangers could only hear each other, they read each other's feelings more accurately.

An elderly man sits in an armchair in a softly lit living room, eyes closed and smiling gently, a corded phone held to his ear, a lamp glowing beside him

Start Your Story Free

Think of the last time someone you love **called you** and you knew, in the first two words, **how they really were.**

Psychologist Michael Kraus ran **five experiments with 1,772 people** to test that hunch. Strangers tried to work out what another person was feeling, with sight, with sound, or with both. **Voice-only did best.**

It was not a study about families or recordings. Still, it points at something plain: **a voice carries feeling that a face can hide, and the people who love you want to hear it.**

1. What the researcher did

Kraus published the work in **American Psychologist** in 2017. In the experiments, people judged the emotions of a stranger, some **seeing and hearing** them, some **only seeing,** and some **only hearing.**

One study was live: the light in the room was switched on and off, so people either **saw each other** or **only heard each other.** Others used **recorded conversations** of strangers.

Same people, same feelings. Only the way you took them in changed.

2. What he found

**Voice-only communication produced higher empathic accuracy** (reading what someone else feels) than vision-only, and than seeing and hearing together, in the live setting and with recordings.

The later experiments point to **attention** as the reason. Without a face to watch, people **focused on the words and the sound of the voice:** the tone, the pauses, the pace.

Take away the face, and people listen harder.

3. What it can and cannot tell us

The people were **strangers,** and the author notes that people who know each other well may read each other differently. The advantage was **not equally strong on every measure** in every experiment.

It **did not test families, recordings of loved ones, or life stories.** What it gently suggests is that **a voice is worth keeping.** One way is to **ask someone to tell a story out loud,** in their own voice, **while you can.**

A face can hide a feeling. A voice, it seems, gives more of it away.

Voice-only communication enhances empathic accuracyMichael W. Kraus, American Psychologist, 2017 (the title of the paper)

What you get with LifeScribe

Start free, with nothing to lose

Just a phone call, free. Ari listens with real interest and keeps your stories in your own voice for the people you love.

The voice you would most like to hear again is somewhere right now. Ask for a story while you can. It is just a phone call.

Keep the voice, not just the words.

Ari calls, asks about the moments that shaped you, and keeps your stories in your own voice for the people you love.

Start Your Story Free

Questions grandparents ask us

What did the study find?

Across five experiments, people judged another person's feelings more accurately when they could only hear them than when they could only see them, or both see and hear them.

Who ran it?

Michael W. Kraus, published in American Psychologist, volume 72, issue 7, pages 644 to 654, in 2017.

How many people took part?

The abstract reports 1,772 participants across five experiments.

Did it study families or recordings of loved ones?

No. The participants were strangers. This page makes no claim that it applies to family recordings.

Why does it matter for a life story?

It suggests that a voice carries feeling that is easy to miss on a screen or a face. A story told out loud and kept holds that voice for the people who come next.

https://getlifescribeapp.com/blog/the-voice-that-read-the-feeling